While writing their research papers, many researchers are sligthly unclear about what they should include in the Results and Discussions sections. To effectively write both these sections you need to clearly understand the distinction between the two. This infographic explains the five main differences between these two sections of a manuscript.
The discussion section of the manuscript should come after the methods and results section and before the conclusion. It should relate back directly to the questions posed in your introduction, and contextualize your results within the literature you have covered in your literature review. In order to make your discussion section engaging, you should include the following information.
Separating Results and Discussion Just as the introduction and methods sections can sometimes be blurred when writing the thesis, especially when aspects of the field site are of prime importance to the study, it can also be difficult to work out what should go in your results and discussion sections. This is especially so when you have a complex dataset, the experiment(s) encountered problems.
The research implications are always supported by a strong statistical significance and correlations of results from your research keeping in view the shortcoming of the study. When you make a “Research recommendation”, you can emphatically state what are the next steps that need to be taken to address a problem, what are the immediate actions that need to be implemented to solve a.
What is the difference between results, discussion, and conclusions in writing a research paper? Question. 118 answers. Asked 27th Aug, 2017; Liqaa Habeb Al-Obaydi; Sometimes we find all these.
Difference between journal research paper and conference research paper We chose to focus on the articles that were more current, since studies made on screens from 1985 cannot be compared with the studies made on today’s screens Research Publish Journals is a worldwide open access peer reviewed online International Journal publishing Organisation.
What is the difference between results, discussion, and conclusions in writing a research paper? Even if it is not a requirement, it is a good idea to write a thesis statement as you begin to organize your research Writing a discussion for a research paper Yes, the research sample and methodology define the fate of the papers. Your data may be weak or inconclusive Figure removed for copyright.
What is the difference between “introduction” and “motivation” sections. Ask Question Asked 5 years ago. Active 5 years ago. Viewed 12k times 3. 2. I am working on a paper about a web data extractor (an application, I developed based on a unique approach). In the introduction I had a short review on the history of such applications (from hard-code to graphical user interface) and said.
Learn the difference between the Results and Discussion sections, and how to accurately highlight important results of your study, using Tables and Figures. This article discusses tips on how to write the results section of a research paper.
A discussion paper presents and discusses in depth the issues that surround a specific topic. When writing a discussion paper, you must include thorough discussion of both sides of the topic being debated, reliable research and evidence regarding the topic. There should also be a solid understanding of the issues discussed before presenting a.
What Makes a Discussion Section Tough to Write? The discussion section is harder to define than other sections of a research paper. It requires perspective, knowledge, and thought. You may have begun writing before the conclusions were formulated. Your data may be weak or inconclusive Figure removed for copyright reasons.
If you have more than 3 or 4 variables in your paper, you. In your discussion section, relate the results back to your initial hypotheses. Do they support or disconfirm them? Remember: Results do not prove hypotheses right or wrong, they support them or fail to provide support for them. I suggest the following information in the following order: Provide a very brief summary of the most.
Conclusions and Recommendations Paper Masters discusses how to properly write conclusions and recommendations for research papers. In the Conclusions and Recommendations section (typically Chapter V of a thesis), you present your interpretation of the results given in Results Section (Usually Chapter IV). You also draw conclusions from your analysis of those results and then make.
What’s the difference between the discussion and conclusion? “I think that the discussion will bring up two or three main points but you need to explain those main points, explain those main conclusions, give an argument to support those main conclusions. But the conclusion section just states those main points and doesn’t give the back-up for it. I like writing the conclusion. I like to.
DATA ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FINDINGS 4.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the analysis of data followed by a discussion of the research findings. The findings relate to the research questions that guided the study. Data were analyzed to identify, describe and explore the relationship between death anxiety and death attitudes of nurses in a private acute care hospital and to determine the.
Key Difference: The primary difference between a research paper and a review paper is that a research paper is based on the author’s original research and their analysis and interpretation of their research finishing, whereas a review paper collects and collates information on a particular topic from various different written publications. There may come a time in a student’s life that.
A typical dissertation includes an introduction, a background or literature review, discussions of the theories and methods used in the research, data analysis and results, a discussion or interpretation of the results, and a conclusion. Each of these components may be in a separate section or chapter, or you may address multiple components within sections.
The Discussion section is where you interpret your findings and place them in context. This section often makes the difference between a good paper and a great paper, so don’t skimp on it. Begin with a clear statement about your research question or hypothesis, then.
This paper comes close to a comparison of two qualitative research methods (focus-group and in-depth interview) used in investigating the opinion of academics, analyzing by comparison the results founded in a research conducted in the Bucharest University of Economics using focus group and in-depth interviews. The conclusions of the study reveal that apart of the limits states in the.